AI Value-Chain Screen

AI Universe

Each name scored against its own layer of true peers on five fundamentals-led axes, a long-term entry tool for 1 to 5 year holds, not a trading signal.

Last updated
Jun 12, 2026
Live · FMP · benchmark QQQ
The AI Space · 2026-06-12
A real bubble with time left — hold quality compute, trim the crowded trades65% odds it is a bubble with quarters-to-years of runway

Demand for AI is genuine and still accelerating, but the near-term picture now has rare agreement between the optimists and the pessimists: even the strongest bulls — Raoul Pal (macro investor) and Jordi Visser (former hedge fund chief), who argue this is a durable supercycle, not a bubble — expect 3-6 months of digestion while roughly $4 trillion of new stock offerings (SpaceX, OpenAI, Anthropic implied) comes to market. New stock supply matters because every dollar of new shares must be bought with cash that would otherwise support existing prices; the analysts at Forward Guidance calculate companies are now issuing more stock than they retire for the first time in 10-15 years (their measure — our second source could not confirm the aggregate, so treat the verified offerings below as the hard number). The warning both camps share: if AI software becomes efficient enough that big tech cuts hardware spending, every AI-adjacent trade — power, memory chips, networking — cracks at once. Memory chips remain the most vulnerable position; new Chinese supply from 2027 is the cycle-breaker.

Voices: Jim Bianco (market researcher — the AI investment-gain earnings engine), Larry McDonald (market strategist — the migration), Tyler/Quinn/Forward Guidance (the stock-supply math and the capex kill switch), Renaissance Capital (IPO research — valuation discipline)
Dissent: Pal and Visser argue the strongest not-a-bubble case on record: price-to-earnings ratios compressed as earnings kept pace, data centers ~30% built, under 1% enterprise adoption — they would buy the digestion, not rotate away. Whale Rock (large tech hedge fund) owns the whole memory chain.
Changes my mind: A leading AI model company stalling breaks the earnings loop; a clean SpaceX debut with broadening leadership weakens the supply-drain case; big tech cutting hardware budgets cracks the downstream trades.
Last change: 2026-06-12 — both camps now agree on the 3-6 month digestion; the supercycle counter-case fully argued and logged
How to read this page

Every company is scored only against its true peer group on four axes — Value (price vs earnings), Quality (profitability, debt), Trend (price momentum), Analysts (Wall Street view). Green letters = strong vs peers, red = weak. SCREEN+ means top of its peer group and SCREEN− bottom — these are research rankings that flag where to look next, not buy or sell orders. Click any company row for a plain-English read.

Today's triage relative rankings, top and bottom of each peer cohort — candidates for the diligence checklist, not recommendations
SCREEN+ · 17
URANVDAPRIMVSTOKLOEROVRTMETAAVGOSNPSBABACOPXCEGLEUTSMANETNFLX
SCREEN− · 14
TSLACORZSMRALABNEEMTRNAAOIROGMRVLCEATKRCPERAMDGEV
DIVERGENCES
⚡ ALAB
AI SPACE TEMPERATURE how extended the universe is right now — context, not in the per-name scores
cold · oversold → deploy65 · Warmhot · extended → be selective
Backdrop: VIX 19 (calm) · Nasdaq-100 +15% vs 200-day (risk-on) · 68% of AI names above their 200-day MA
ENERGY · PRODUCERS cash-flowing power generators (IPPs & utilities) · 5 names · click a row for the read
#NameScreenScoreAxes V·Q·T·ARosterPriceValuation
1 VST SCREEN+ +1.29 VQTA ▲ $148.83 +1.7% Fwd P/E 13×
PEG 0.9 · 11× EBITDA · 4.3× sales · +2% FCF		 ⌄
Screen+ (top of cohort): fairly valued, high quality, mid-trend, analysts bullish; roster-backed (AI-power demand, merchant nuclear/gas) — top of its layer.
Quality ROIC 1% ND/EBITDA 3.0 · Trend 200d -13% · 52w 17% · RS1y -49% · Analysts upside +53% · rating +0.91
2 CEG SCREEN+ +0.68 VQTA ▲ $251.11 +1.8% Fwd P/E 19×
PEG 0.9 · 16× EBITDA · 3.7× sales · +1% FCF		 ⌄
Screen+ (top of cohort): fairly valued, average quality, on an attractive pullback; roster-backed (AI-power demand, nuclear PPAs (Gromen electrical-infrastructure thesis)).
Quality ROIC 4% ND/EBITDA 3.0 · Trend 200d -22% · 52w 5% · RS1y -51% · Analysts upside +56% · rating +0.75
3 TLN +0.20 VQTA ▲ $356.11 +3.3% Fwd P/E 12×
PEG 0.5 · 27× EBITDA · 4.7× sales · +6% FCF		 ⌄
Mid-cohort: cheap vs peers, weak quality, mid-trend, analysts bullish; roster-backed (AI-power demand, nuclear (Amazon datacenter deal)).
Quality ROIC -3% ND/EBITDA 7.2 · Trend 200d -4% · 52w 51% · RS1y -5% · Analysts upside +34% · rating +1.00
4 GEV SCREEN− -0.61 VQTA · $930.03 +2.6% Fwd P/E 38×
PEG 1.1 · 73× EBITDA · 6.2× sales · +3% FCF		 ⌄
Screen− (bottom of cohort): expensive vs peers, high quality, mid-trend.
Quality ROIC 10% ND/EBITDA -2.2 · Trend 200d +22% · 52w 67% · RS1y +56% · Analysts upside +22% · rating +0.75
5 NEE SCREEN− -1.57 VQTA · $85.90 +1.2% Fwd P/E 19×
PEG 2.5 · 16× EBITDA · 10.0× sales · +1% FCF		 ⌄
Screen− (bottom of cohort): expensive vs peers, average quality, mid-trend, analysts cautious.
Quality ROIC 4% ND/EBITDA 5.9 · Trend 200d +0% · 52w 58% · RS1y -18% · Analysts upside +15% · rating +0.64
ENERGY · FRONTIER pre-revenue power & storage · 5 names · click a row for the read
#NameScreenScoreAxes V·Q·T·ARosterPriceValuation
1 OKLO SCREEN+ +1.19 VQTA · $58.13 +0.5% 0.0× sales
-2% FCF		 ⌄
Screen+ (top of cohort): cheap vs peers, pre-revenue / unprofitable, mid-trend, analysts bullish — top of its layer.
Quality ROIC -6% ND/EBITDA 12.7 · Trend 200d -32% · 52w 10% · RS1y -45% · Analysts upside +57% · rating +0.77
2 BE +0.46 VQTA · $267.45 +7.5% Fwd P/E 61×
PEG 1.1 · 853× EBITDA · 30.9× sales · +0% FCF		 ⌄
Mid-cohort: fairly valued, high quality, extended or lagging.
Quality ROIC 4% ND/EBITDA 3.2 · Trend 200d +79% · 52w 86% · RS1y +200% · Analysts upside -14% · rating +0.42
3 EOSE +0.24 VQTA · $6.47 +4.4% 11.6× sales
-23% FCF		 ⌄
Mid-cohort: expensive vs peers, average quality, mid-trend.
Quality ROIC -42% ND/EBITDA -0.2 · Trend 200d -39% · 52w 16% · RS1y +21% · Analysts upside +70% · rating +0.30
4 FLNC -0.07 VQTA · $25.18 +3.7% Fwd P/E 116×
PEG 1.0 · 1.8× sales · -6% FCF		 ⌄
Mid-cohort: fairly valued, average quality, extended or lagging, analysts cautious.
Quality ROIC -5% ND/EBITDA 1.0 · Trend 200d +42% · 52w 74% · RS1y +200% · Analysts upside -23% · rating +0.30
5 SMR SCREEN− -1.82 VQTA · $10.13 +5.9% 143.8× sales
-25% FCF		 ⌄
Screen− (bottom of cohort): expensive vs peers, pre-revenue / unprofitable, mid-trend.
Quality ROIC -64% ND/EBITDA 0.5 · Trend 200d -52% · 52w 2% · RS1y -110% · Analysts upside +60% · rating +0.31
MATERIALS copper, uranium, gases, advanced materials · 13 names · click a row for the read
#NameScreenScoreAxes V·Q·T·ARosterPriceValuation
1 URA ETF SCREEN+ +2.34 VQTA ▲ $45.68 +1.9% ETF — price only ⌄
Price-only ETF (no fundamentals); on trend it is leading its group.
Trend 200d -8% · 52w 37% · RS1y -8%
2 ERO SCREEN+ +0.96 VQTA ▲ $29.01 +4.7% Fwd P/E 6×
7× EBITDA · 3.8× sales · +4% FCF		 ⌄
Screen+ (top of cohort): cheap vs peers, high quality, mid-trend, analysts cautious; roster-backed (Copper miner, electrification demand).
Quality ROIC 14% ND/EBITDA 1.0 · Trend 200d +12% · 52w 64% · RS1y +50% · Analysts upside +9% · rating +0.33
3 COPX ETF SCREEN+ +0.70 VQTA ▲ $85.57 +2.9% ETF — price only ⌄
Price-only ETF (no fundamentals); on trend it is middling.
Trend 200d +16% · 52w 81% · RS1y +62%
4 LEU SCREEN+ +0.63 VQTA ▲ $163.55 +3.1% Fwd P/E 58×
27× EBITDA · 5.3× sales · -2% FCF		 ⌄
Screen+ (top of cohort): expensive vs peers, average quality, on an attractive pullback, analysts bullish; roster-backed (Enrichment / nuclear fuel cycle, US strategic).
Quality ROIC 1% ND/EBITDA -7.8 · Trend 200d -34% · 52w 6% · RS1y -31% · Analysts upside +62% · rating +0.42
5 FCX +0.33 VQTA ▲ $68.03 +2.5% Fwd P/E 18×
PEG 1.4 · 11× EBITDA · 3.9× sales · +6% FCF		 ⌄
Mid-cohort: fairly valued, average quality, mid-trend; roster-backed (Copper, electrification (Macro Voices 'most bullish commodity chart')).
Quality ROIC 9% ND/EBITDA 0.7 · Trend 200d +26% · 52w 90% · RS1y +31% · Analysts upside +5% · rating +0.51
6 CC +0.18 VQTA · $22.07 +2.6% Fwd P/E 10×
PEG 0.5 · 1.2× sales · +5% FCF		 ⌄
Mid-cohort: cheap vs peers, weak quality, mid-trend.
Quality ROIC -0% ND/EBITDA -33.3 · Trend 200d +28% · 52w 66% · RS1y +58% · Analysts upside +17% · rating +0.40
7 CCJ -0.12 VQTA ▲ $101.46 +2.5% Fwd P/E 39×
PEG 1.9 · 75× EBITDA · 17.4× sales · +1% FCF		 ⌄
Mid-cohort: expensive vs peers, average quality, on an attractive pullback, analysts bullish; roster-backed (Uranium structural bull (Macro Voices max-bullish long-term)).
Quality ROIC 5% ND/EBITDA -0.1 · Trend 200d -1% · 52w 52% · RS1y +19% · Analysts upside +38% · rating +0.63
8 LIN -0.20 VQTA · $525.19 +1.9% Fwd P/E 27×
PEG 1.9 · 21× EBITDA · 7.6× sales · +2% FCF		 ⌄
Mid-cohort: expensive vs peers, average quality, extended or lagging, analysts bullish.
Quality ROIC 10% ND/EBITDA 1.7 · Trend 200d +13% · 52w 100% · RS1y -23% · Analysts upside +7% · rating +0.86
9 COPP ETF -0.27 VQTA · $41.90 +2.5% ETF — price only ⌄
Price-only ETF (no fundamentals); on trend it is middling.
Trend 200d +20% · 52w 84% · RS1y +55%
10 CPER ETF SCREEN− -0.76 VQTA · $39.10 +0.4% ETF — price only ⌄
Price-only ETF (no fundamentals); on trend it is middling.
Trend 200d +14% · 52w 89% · RS1y -5%
11 CE SCREEN− -1.11 VQTA · $53.00 +2.6% Fwd P/E 8×
PEG 0.2 · 50× EBITDA · 1.7× sales · +16% FCF		 ⌄
Screen− (bottom of cohort): cheap vs peers, weak quality, mid-trend.
Quality ROIC -4% ND/EBITDA 32.6 · Trend 200d +7% · 52w 52% · RS1y -41% · Analysts upside +24% · rating +0.19
12 ROG SCREEN− -1.16 VQTA · $150.14 +2.8% Fwd P/E 34×
24× EBITDA · 3.1× sales · +4% FCF		 ⌄
Screen− (bottom of cohort): fairly valued, weak quality, mid-trend.
Quality ROIC -2% ND/EBITDA -1.6 · Trend 200d +47% · 52w 95% · RS1y +79% · Analysts upside -0% · rating +0.58
13 MTRN SCREEN− -1.52 VQTA · $247.04 +0.4% Fwd P/E 33×
31× EBITDA · 3.0× sales · +0% FCF		 ⌄
Screen− (bottom of cohort): fairly valued, average quality, mid-trend, analysts cautious.
Quality ROIC 7% ND/EBITDA 3.0 · Trend 200d +68% · 52w 100% · RS1y +171% · Analysts upside -35% · rating +0.50
CHIPS semiconductors & design tools · 11 names · click a row for the read
#NameScreenScoreAxes V·Q·T·ARosterPriceValuation
1 NVDA SCREEN+ +2.10 VQTA ▲ $205.66 +0.4% Fwd P/E 23×
PEG 0.8 · 26× EBITDA · 19.6× sales · +2% FCF		 ⌄
Screen+ (top of cohort): cheap vs peers, high quality, mid-trend, analysts bullish; roster-backed (Whale Rock top compute long; demand >> supply for 4 years) — top of its layer.
Quality ROIC 63% ND/EBITDA -0.0 · Trend 200d +9% · 52w 68% · RS1y +7% · Analysts upside +50% · rating +0.75
2 AVGO SCREEN+ +0.74 VQTA ▲ $380.67 -1.3% Fwd P/E 20×
PEG 2.8 · 44× EBITDA · 24.6× sales · +2% FCF		 ⌄
Screen+ (top of cohort): fairly valued, average quality, on an attractive pullback, analysts bullish; roster-backed (Custom silicon / AI networking beneficiary).
Quality ROIC 19% ND/EBITDA 1.1 · Trend 200d +6% · 52w 57% · RS1y +14% · Analysts upside +31% · rating +0.88
3 SNPS SCREEN+ +0.73 VQTA · $454.33 -0.4% Fwd P/E 26×
PEG 1.6 · 35× EBITDA · 11.0× sales · +3% FCF		 ⌄
Screen+ (top of cohort): cheap vs peers, weak quality, on an attractive pullback.
Quality ROIC 2% ND/EBITDA 3.1 · Trend 200d -2% · 52w 28% · RS1y -43% · Analysts upside +20% · rating +0.76
4 TSM SCREEN+ +0.59 VQTA ▲ $424.28 +0.8% Fwd P/E 21×
PEG 7.9 · 20× EBITDA · 14.1× sales · +2% FCF		 ⌄
Screen+ (top of cohort): fairly valued, average quality, mid-trend; roster-backed (Whale Rock: logic is the real bottleneck, sustainable vs memory).
Quality ROIC 26% ND/EBITDA -0.7 · Trend 200d +28% · 52w 91% · RS1y +62% · Analysts upside +8% · rating +0.72
5 MU +0.08 VQTA ▼ $991.02 -0.5% Fwd P/E 9×
30× EBITDA · 19.1× sales · +1% FCF		 ⌄
Mid-cohort: fairly valued, average quality, mid-trend; roster-flagged (Memory danger zone: Visser exited, Fritzell bubble call, Chinese supply 2027 (consensus short)).
Quality ROIC 28% ND/EBITDA -0.0 · Trend 200d +160% · 52w 91% · RS1y +200% · Analysts upside -9% · rating +0.79
6 SNDK -0.01 VQTA ▼ $1,974 +4.9% Fwd P/E 10×
PEG 1.8 · 53× EBITDA · 21.8× sales · +2% FCF		 ⌄
Mid-cohort: fairly valued, average quality, mid-trend; roster-flagged (Pure NAND memory, most exposed to the oversupply call).
Quality ROIC 31% ND/EBITDA -0.7 · Trend 200d +244% · 52w 100% · RS1y +200% · Analysts upside -20% · rating +0.87
7 WDC -0.12 VQTA ▼ $563.05 +6.4% Fwd P/E 32×
PEG 0.7 · 26× EBITDA · 16.4× sales · +2% FCF		 ⌄
Mid-cohort: fairly valued, average quality, mid-trend, analysts cautious; roster-flagged (NAND/memory oversupply risk, same thesis as MU).
Quality ROIC 28% ND/EBITDA -0.0 · Trend 200d +122% · 52w 94% · RS1y +200% · Analysts upside -17% · rating +0.70
8 CDNS -0.49 VQTA · $385.05 +0.3% Fwd P/E 41×
PEG 4.2 · 57× EBITDA · 19.5× sales · +1% FCF		 ⌄
Mid-cohort: expensive vs peers, weak quality, mid-trend, analysts bullish.
Quality ROIC 12% ND/EBITDA 0.9 · Trend 200d +18% · 52w 79% · RS1y -10% · Analysts upside +7% · rating +0.81
9 AMD SCREEN− -0.71 VQTA · $514.34 +5.3% Fwd P/E 39×
PEG 1.0 · 103× EBITDA · 22.3× sales · +1% FCF		 ⌄
Screen− (bottom of cohort): expensive vs peers, average quality, mid-trend, analysts cautious.
Quality ROIC 6% ND/EBITDA -0.2 · Trend 200d +103% · 52w 93% · RS1y +200% · Analysts upside -13% · rating +0.70
10 MRVL SCREEN− -1.16 VQTA · $278.10 -0.9% Fwd P/E 69×
PEG 1.4 · 53× EBITDA · 28.0× sales · +1% FCF		 ⌄
Screen− (bottom of cohort): expensive vs peers, weak quality, mid-trend.
Quality ROIC 5% ND/EBITDA 0.3 · Trend 200d +156% · 52w 85% · RS1y +200% · Analysts upside -17% · rating +0.81
11 ALAB ⚡ SCREEN− -1.75 VQTA ▲ $374.57 +1.9% Fwd P/E 87×
PEG 8.2 · 228× EBITDA · 63.7× sales · +1% FCF		 ⌄
Screen− (bottom of cohort): expensive vs peers, average quality, mid-trend; roster-backed (AI interconnect, infrastructure layer).
Quality ROIC 14% ND/EBITDA -0.5 · Trend 200d +106% · 52w 100% · RS1y +200% · Analysts upside -36% · rating +0.81
INFRASTRUCTURE datacenter, electrical, networking, construction · 11 names · click a row for the read
#NameScreenScoreAxes V·Q·T·ARosterPriceValuation
1 PRIM SCREEN+ +1.67 VQTA · $98.95 +4.7% Fwd P/E 17×
PEG 1.3 · 13× EBITDA · 0.8× sales · +3% FCF		 ⌄
Screen+ (top of cohort): cheap vs peers, average quality, on an attractive pullback, analysts bullish — top of its layer.
Quality ROIC 10% ND/EBITDA 1.3 · Trend 200d -28% · 52w 20% · RS1y -0% · Analysts upside +55% · rating +0.62
2 VRT SCREEN+ +0.91 VQTA · $301.02 +1.1% Fwd P/E 34×
PEG 1.6 · 50× EBITDA · 10.7× sales · +2% FCF		 ⌄
Screen+ (top of cohort): fairly valued, average quality, on an attractive pullback, analysts bullish.
Quality ROIC 20% ND/EBITDA 0.4 · Trend 200d +37% · 52w 72% · RS1y +128% · Analysts upside +25% · rating +0.95
3 ANET SCREEN+ +0.59 VQTA ▲ $163.81 +4.7% Fwd P/E 37×
PEG 1.4 · 44× EBITDA · 20.9× sales · +3% FCF		 ⌄
Screen+ (top of cohort): fairly valued, high quality, mid-trend; roster-backed (AI datacenter networking).
Quality ROIC 22% ND/EBITDA -0.6 · Trend 200d +16% · 52w 85% · RS1y +36% · Analysts upside +12% · rating +0.75
4 QXO +0.45 VQTA · $16.67 +0.5% Fwd P/E 25×
PEG 0.5 · 94× EBITDA · 1.5× sales · +2% FCF		 ⌄
Mid-cohort: fairly valued, weak quality, on an attractive pullback, analysts bullish.
Quality ROIC -2% ND/EBITDA 6.2 · Trend 200d -18% · 52w 13% · RS1y -52% · Analysts upside +76% · rating +1.00
5 ETN +0.41 VQTA · $394.06 +0.1% Fwd P/E 25×
PEG 1.4 · 29× EBITDA · 6.1× sales · +3% FCF		 ⌄
Mid-cohort: fairly valued, average quality, mid-trend.
Quality ROIC 9% ND/EBITDA 3.6 · Trend 200d +7% · 52w 67% · RS1y -15% · Analysts upside +4% · rating +0.64
6 MYRG +0.18 VQTA · $445.69 +4.8% Fwd P/E 34×
PEG 1.8 · 26× EBITDA · 1.8× sales · +3% FCF		 ⌄
Mid-cohort: fairly valued, average quality, mid-trend, analysts cautious.
Quality ROIC 16% ND/EBITDA -0.4 · Trend 200d +64% · 52w 89% · RS1y +135% · Analysts upside -7% · rating +0.43
7 STRL +0.07 VQTA · $865.15 +3.2% Fwd P/E 36×
PEG 1.8 · 45× EBITDA · 9.1× sales · +2% FCF		 ⌄
Mid-cohort: fairly valued, high quality, mid-trend, analysts cautious.
Quality ROIC 22% ND/EBITDA -0.3 · Trend 200d +98% · 52w 84% · RS1y +200% · Analysts upside -24% · rating +0.78
8 PWR +0.05 VQTA · $707.45 +3.5% Fwd P/E 43×
PEG 2.5 · 44× EBITDA · 3.6× sales · +2% FCF		 ⌄
Mid-cohort: fairly valued, high quality, mid-trend.
Quality ROIC 8% ND/EBITDA 0.3 · Trend 200d +37% · 52w 82% · RS1y +63% · Analysts upside -5% · rating +0.75
9 ATKR SCREEN− -0.98 VQTA · $80.17 +1.5% Fwd P/E 13×
PEG 1.0 · 81× EBITDA · 1.1× sales · +5% FCF		 ⌄
Screen− (bottom of cohort): cheap vs peers, weak quality, mid-trend, analysts cautious.
Quality ROIC 5% ND/EBITDA 12.1 · Trend 200d +20% · 52w 83% · RS1y -15% · Analysts upside -1% · rating +0.36
10 AAOI SCREEN− -1.52 VQTA · $174.53 +1.0% Fwd P/E 30×
PEG 0.3 · 27.0× sales · -2% FCF		 ⌄
Screen− (bottom of cohort): expensive vs peers, weak quality, mid-trend, analysts cautious.
Quality ROIC -4% ND/EBITDA 16.0 · Trend 200d +136% · 52w 77% · RS1y +200% · Analysts upside -8% · rating +0.25
11 CORZ SCREEN− -1.83 VQTA · $28.12 +3.3% Fwd P/E 59×
PEG 0.9 · 112× EBITDA · 28.1× sales · -5% FCF		 ⌄
Screen− (bottom of cohort): expensive vs peers, weak quality, mid-trend, analysts bullish.
Quality ROIC -7% ND/EBITDA 11.8 · Trend 200d +53% · 52w 95% · RS1y +97% · Analysts upside +17% · rating +0.86
MODELS foundation models · 0 names · click a row for the read
Foundation-model pure-plays (OpenAI, Anthropic) are private; closest public proxies (GOOG, META) are in Apps.
APPLICATIONS applications & platforms · 5 names · click a row for the read
#NameScreenScoreAxes V·Q·T·ARosterPriceValuation
1 META SCREEN+ +0.84 VQTA · $565.73 -0.5% Fwd P/E 16×
PEG 0.9 · 13× EBITDA · 7.0× sales · +3% FCF		 ⌄
Screen+ (top of cohort): fairly valued, average quality, mid-trend — top of its layer.
Quality ROIC 20% ND/EBITDA 0.6 · Trend 200d -14% · 52w 15% · RS1y -53% · Analysts upside +46% · rating +0.82
2 BABA SCREEN+ +0.73 VQTA · $111.40 -1.1% Fwd P/E 3×
PEG 0.1 · 13× EBITDA · 1.9× sales · -3% FCF		 ⌄
Screen+ (top of cohort): cheap vs peers, weak quality, mid-trend, analysts bullish.
Quality ROIC 3% ND/EBITDA 0.6 · Trend 200d -26% · 52w 9% · RS1y -39% · Analysts upside +70% · rating +0.85
3 NFLX SCREEN+ +0.55 VQTA · $79.79 -1.8% Fwd P/E 21×
PEG 1.2 · 10× EBITDA · 7.3× sales · +4% FCF		 ⌄
Screen+ (top of cohort): fairly valued, average quality, mid-trend, analysts cautious.
Quality ROIC 23% ND/EBITDA 0.2 · Trend 200d -20% · 52w 7% · RS1y -69% · Analysts upside +40% · rating +0.58
4 GOOG -0.27 VQTA · $360.59 +1.1% Fwd P/E 25×
PEG 1.5 · 20× EBITDA · 10.5× sales · +1% FCF		 ⌄
Mid-cohort: expensive vs peers, average quality, extended or lagging.
Quality ROIC 19% ND/EBITDA 0.2 · Trend 200d +17% · 52w 84% · RS1y +69% · Analysts upside +11% · rating +0.90
5 TSLA SCREEN− -1.84 VQTA · $396.35 -0.7% Fwd P/E 164×
PEG 2.6 · 141× EBITDA · 15.1× sales · +0% FCF		 ⌄
Screen− (bottom of cohort): expensive vs peers, average quality, extended or lagging, analysts cautious.
Quality ROIC 3% ND/EBITDA -0.7 · Trend 200d -5% · 52w 52% · RS1y -10% · Analysts upside +14% · rating +0.21
Method. Five axes, fundamentals-led: Value 30 · Quality 25 · Trend/Entry 15 · Analysts 15 · Roster 15 (conviction tilt from the tracked thought leaders). Scores are cross-sectional within each peer layer (robust z, re-standardized); SCREEN+ ≥ +0.5σ, SCREEN− ≤ −0.5σ. Relative rankings for triage — which names earn the diligence checklist — never buy/sell recommendations; decisions live at the sleeve level. ETFs score on price/momentum only. Foundation-model pure-plays (OpenAI, Anthropic) are private; closest public proxies (GOOG, META) are in Apps. Data: FMP. Not investment advice.